The first of three United States presidential debates ahead of the 2024 election took place on June 27 in Atlanta. Notably, this debate was conducted without a studio audience, a first since the historic debates of 1960. However, the absence of a crowd wasn't the only significant omission of the evening.
The Debate's Blind Spots: AI and Quantum Computing
Despite covering a broad spectrum of issues, including immigration, voter perception, and the economy, the debate conspicuously lacked any discussion on "artificial intelligence" or "quantum computing." This oversight is particularly striking given the profound impact these technologies have had and are expected to have in the near future.
The Significance of AI in 2024
Artificial intelligence has become a cornerstone of the U.S. economy and technology sector over the past four years. U.S.-based firms specializing in AI products and services now rank among the most valuable companies globally. A recent study by Bank of America estimates that AI will contribute over $13 trillion to the global economy by 2030, positioning the U.S. to benefit substantially. Despite this, the debate moderators and candidates failed to address the topic.
Incumbent President Joe Biden's assertion that climate change is the sole existential threat to Americans further underscores the neglect of AI. While climate change is undeniably critical, many experts argue that artificial general intelligence, with its potential for human-level cognition, poses a comparable existential risk.
Quantum Computing: An Emerging Challenge
Similarly, the debate overlooked the topic of quantum computing. As this technology rapidly advances, it holds the potential to revolutionize fields such as banking, logistics, and scientific research. However, it also poses significant risks, including the possibility of adversaries using quantum computers to break encryption and steal sensitive data. The omission of any discussion on this issue leaves a critical gap in the debate.
Future Debates: A Hope for Tech Discussions?
The first debate's exclusion of key technological issues such as AI, quantum computing, cryptocurrency, blockchain, and election security is a notable shortfall. The focus remained narrowly on traditional topics, with the only tech-related discussion revolving around the need for machines to detect fentanyl at the southern border.
As the election season progresses, there is hope that subsequent debates will address these pivotal technologies. Given their profound implications for the future, a comprehensive discussion on AI and quantum computing is essential for informed voter decision-making.
